The Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committee held on May 2nd a hearing on SB 1201 that would prohibit the Department of Environmental Protection from adopting a regulation to require power plants to reduce their toxic mercury pollution by 80 percent in 2010 and by 90 percent in 2015. Unfortunately, the line up of witnesses was heavily biased toward industry’s position on mercury.
Testifying was Dr. Jack Snyder, a member of the board of the Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy. The Center receives most of its funding from the National Manufacturers Association (NAM), and its founder was a former NAM vice president. Exxon/Mobile is also a major Annapolis Center funder. Dr. Snyder regularly provides testimony in various forums in support of industry positions. For example, he provided testimony in New Jersey in which he offered, “From a scientific and medical perspective, there is no basis for the contention that exposure to MTBE causes objectively verifiable human health effects.”
And he was singing the same song about mercury pollution asserting that U.S. power plants contribute only a small amount of the world’s mercury pollution, that there is no evidence of hotspots and that there’s no proof that mercury harms babies. He apparently has missed several facts: most of the mercury contamination in Pennsylvania originates from Pennsylvania, not international sources; 83 percent of Pennsylvania’s mercury pollution comes from Pennsylvania power plants. He also apparently dismisses decades of scientific studies that confirm the links between exposure to mercury and impaired neurological development in children.
The rest of the line up consisted of George Ellis of the Pennsylvania Coal Association, Eugene Trisko, hired gun for the United Mine Workers and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Gene Barr of the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, and finally, Myron Arnowitt of Clean Water Action.
The industry testifiers made blanket assertions not based in fact, and unfortunately, the committee members did not challenge them. For example, George Ellis claimed that there is no evidence that burning coal harms people, and nobody on the committee pointed out the mountains of information about the death and illness caused by breathing the fine soot and the ozone caused by power plant pollution.
The senators specifically asked for, and received uncritically, scientific information from the non-scientists representing industry at this hearing. On the other hand, they vigorously challenged Myron Arnowitt’s review of scientific studies that show that local mercury pollution results in local contamination, and that reductions in local emissions lead directly to reductions in mercury contamination in the environment.
The committee will hold another hearing on mercury. We hope next time, they will ask to hear from some of the many medical experts and researchers who have conducted studies on the health and environmental harms that mercury pollution causes who do not dismiss the dangers to women and babies.