The warning signs are all around us — the legacy of the industrial age is ushering in dramatic changes to the global climate. There’s no longer any use in even debating the issue, because the empirical data is too overwhelming, except for the looniest of flat earth theory adherents.
What remains to be seen (and debated) is the longer range impact of climate change. Warning signs certainly abound there, as well. What everyone wants to know, though, is “ok, so how am I impacted?” The plight of the polar bears, as tragic as it might be, just doesn’t touch a nerve with most people on a personal level. In fact, the real impact of climate change is mostly charted on such a distant calendar that our short attention span society figures there’s always tomorrow to fix the problem.
The magnitude of the changes being documented is not “fixable”, in a classic sense. We can make adjustments to our own personal habits, maybe even dramatic shifts in carbon-based fuel usage could take place (were the global political will available to do so), but the die is pretty much cast at this point. Remaining questions include, “well, should I buy some future beachfront property in the Poconos, then?”.
A column today on Counter Currents discusses the collapse of the Greenland Ice Shield, and potential ramifications. It’s not pretty. Lest you think that some tree hugging alarmist is ringing the claxon again, consider that the column is based on a U.S. Navy survey that suggests there will be no sea ice left in the Arctic Ocean as soon as 2016.
2016. Let that date roll off of your brain for a moment.
10 years from today, the Arctic Ocean could be as liquid as the Atlantic and Pacific. That’s a scary thought not only for the polar bears, but for every human on the planet. I was looking at a world map a little while ago, and when you consider the size of Greenland, and the implications of a large part of that semi-continent just slipping into the sea, it should cause everyone to pause. The mechanism for the collapse of the Greenland ice shield is well known, and it doesn’t take an array of supercomputers to predict the impact. It’s relatively simple physics.
There are no answers, there’s no way to reverse the impact of the industrial age on a climate that’s already adjusted (in negative ways) to mankind’s prescence on the face of the earth. Dinosaur’s roamed the globe for millions of years, but were gone in, geologically speaking, a moment in time.
It’s kind of funny, in a way. I was thinking back to one of George Carlin’s best rants that I first heard many years ago. The meat of Carlin’s monologue goes like this:
…The planet has been through a lot worse than us. Been through all kinds of things worse than us. Been through earthquakes, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drift, solar flares, sun spots, magnetic storms, the magnetic reversal of the poles…hundreds of thousands of years of bombardment by comets and asteroids and meteors, worlwide floods, tidal waves, worldwide fires, erosion, cosmic rays, recurring ice ages…And we think some plastic bags, and some aluminum cans are going to make a difference? The planet…the planet…the planet isn’t going anywhere. WE ARE!
We’re going away. Pack your shit, folks. We’re going away. And we won’t leave much of a trace, either. Thank God for that. Maybe a little styrofoam. Maybe. A little styrofoam. The planet’ll be here and we’ll be long gone. Just another failed mutation. Just another closed-end biological mistake. An evolutionary cul-de-sac. The planet’ll shake us off like a bad case of fleas. A surface nuisance…
Indeed. Pack your shit. Pack your kid’s shit, the parent’s shit, and the pet cat’s shit. It’s isn’t going to be pretty, and it’s going to get ugly a lot sooner than we’re being led to believe, I’m afraid.
I’m a lot more concerned about an environmental armageddon in my lifetime than the biblical four horsemen of the apocalypse. Come to think of it, perhaps they already visited, and we just didn’t take notice.